Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 13 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2023-05-09 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 1400 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro is better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, with a 79.5 score against 71.5. Both devices we are comparing here work with the same Android 13 operating system. Despite being the best phone in this comparison review, the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro body is a bit thicker and just a bit heavier than OSCAL Tiger 12.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much greater hardware performance than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro. Both have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has a just a little worse display density and a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, it also counts with a really brighter display and a little bit larger screen.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB. Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features just a bit longer battery performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro captures much better videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 12. They have a same resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.