Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, getting an 81.6 score against 71.5. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's body is just a bit heavier and thicker than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has the previous 10 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a lot better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, a little higher display pixel density, a really brighter screen and a quite larger display. OSCAL Tiger 12 has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a little bit better hardware performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC shoots much better photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12. They have a 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a bit better battery performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has a 3% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.