| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 0000-00-00 | -- |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 481 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 8.69 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has a score of 82.2, which is better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's score of 71.5. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has an older 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11's body is just a little bit thicker but just a little bit lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has just a bit better processing power than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a way better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a bit worse display pixels density and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2460px, it also counts with a quite bigger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 takes slightly better photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lot less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has a battery life that is very similar to the OSCAL Tiger 12 one.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.