Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 0000-00-00 | -- |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a lot better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, with a score of 86.1 against 71.5. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has an older 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro design has the same thickness than OSCAL Tiger 12, but it is a little bit heavier.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a way better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a lot worse 1080 x 2460 resolution and a little worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little larger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a very superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot better 108 mega-pixels resolution. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery duration than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has a 3 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.