Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's general score of 71.5. Even being the best device in this review, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a a little bit thicker and just a little heavier device than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a lot better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460, a quite better count of pixels in each display inch and a bit larger display. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much bigger storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB and more internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little bit better processing power than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a battery life that's very similar to the OSCAL Tiger 12 one, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a 0% bigger battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a greater camera than OSCAL Tiger 12. They have a 64 MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.