Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a global score of 79, which is better than OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 overall score. Even being the best device in this comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a a little bit heavier and just a little thicker device than the OSCAL Tiger 12. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a processing unit that is just as good as OSCAL Tiger 12's processor, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has lesser RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a little bit higher pixel count in each inch in the display, a quite bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 resolution.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much greater memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has more internal memory and a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a much less MP back camera. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a battery lifetime that is just as good as OSCAL Tiger 12's battery life, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.