Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 11.00mm focal length |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 10 Pro is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12, having a overall score of 80.2 against 71.5. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but ZTE Axon 10 Pro has older 10 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter device than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much better looking screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a bit inferior number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2460 resolution and a bit larger screen. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a bit faster CPU than OSCAL Tiger 12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro captures a lot better pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a way worse resolution back camera.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features greater battery life than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.