Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-03-30 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 11 is a bit better than OSCAL Tiger 12, with a 76 score against 71.5. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the ZTE Axon 11 has older 10 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. ZTE Axon 11 is a somewhat lighter and a bit thinner phone than OSCAL Tiger 12. The ZTE Axon 11 features a bit better processor than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a lot better display than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a just a little lower pixels amount in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2460 resolution and a little bit larger screen. The ZTE Axon 11 features more storage for apps and games than OSCAL Tiger 12, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the ZTE Axon 11 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 2 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features improved battery life than ZTE Axon 11, because it has a 25% more battery size. ZTE Axon 11 captures much better photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12. They have a 64 MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.