| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
ZTE Axon 20 has an overall score of 77.8, which is slightly better than OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 score. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but ZTE Axon 20 has older 10 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. ZTE Axon 20 is a just a bit thinner and just a bit lighter phone than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
ZTE Axon 20 features a bit more powerful CPU than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 processing cores. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much sharper screen than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2460px, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a superior memory to install games and applications than ZTE Axon 20, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with superior battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 20, because it has an 18 percent greater battery capacity.
ZTE Axon 20 features a very superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both have a same resolution back-facing camera.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.