Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 0000-00-00 | -- |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.70 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Aqua and Black |
| -- | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 32000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 13.59 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| 8.69 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 30 5G is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12, having a general score of 79.9 against 71.5. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the ZTE Axon 30 5G has older 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. The ZTE Axon 30 5G is a just a little bit thinner and a little lighter device than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
ZTE Axon 30 5G counts with a lot better hardware performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a slightly better looking screen than ZTE Axon 30 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2460 resolution, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also counts with a just a bit better screen density.
ZTE Axon 30 5G's camera is just as good as the OSCAL Tiger 12 one, both have a camera with a 64 mega pixels resolution. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than ZTE Axon 30 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a little longer battery life than ZTE Axon 30 5G, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.