Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 262 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is better than OSCAL Tiger 13, with an 85 score against 73.4. The iPhone 8 construction is thinner and noticeably lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 13. Apple iPhone 8 features a much better looking display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit worse 750 x 1334 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels number in each inch in the display.
OSCAL Tiger 13 has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than iPhone 8, and although they both have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 2 TB. The iPhone 8 counts with a bit faster CPU than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and less CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
IPhone 8 has a very superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a camera in the back with way less MP resolution. The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a superior battery duration than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 175 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.