Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is better than the OSCAL Tiger 13's 73.4 global score. Google Pixel 2's body is notably lighter and a little thinner than the OSCAL Tiger 13. The OSCAL Tiger 13 and the Google Pixel 2 both have very similar processors, and although the Google Pixel 2 has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Google Pixel 2 has a more vivid screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater pixels quantity per inch of screen and a better 1080 x 1920 resolution. The Google Pixel 2 features a superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a way lower 12.2 mega-pixels resolution camera.
OSCAL Tiger 13 features much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB and 256 GB internal storage. OSCAL Tiger 13 has a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.