Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android |
| -- | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 262 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 is better than the OSCAL Tiger 13, having an 84.7 score against 73.4. Even being the best in this review, the Samsung Galaxy A32 body is just a bit thicker and just a little heavier than the OSCAL Tiger 13. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system, while OSCAL Tiger 13 comes with Android 14 operating system.
Galaxy A32 counts with a display that's just as good as OSCAL Tiger 13's screen, because although the Galaxy A32 has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 720 x 1600 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen. OSCAL Tiger 13 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A32, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 2 TB. Samsung Galaxy A32 and OSCAL Tiger 13 count with very similar battery durations. Samsung Galaxy A32 features a way better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a less mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.