Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2018) is better than the OSCAL Tiger 13, getting an 84.2 score against 73.4. The Galaxy A7 (2018) body is somewhat lighter and thinner than the OSCAL Tiger 13. The Galaxy A7 (2018) has a processing unit that's very similar to the OSCAL Tiger 13 one, and although the Galaxy A7 (2018) has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a brighter display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better count of pixels per inch of screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2220px. The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB and 256 GB internal memory.
OSCAL Tiger 13 features a very superior battery life than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh. Galaxy A7 (2018) has a superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a camera in the back with a lot worse 24 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.