Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 is better than the OSCAL Tiger 13, getting a general score of 84.9 against 73.4. Even being the best in this comparison review, Galaxy A80 is a just a little heavier and just a little thicker device than OSCAL Tiger 13. Galaxy A80 counts with a better screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy A80 also has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a higher screen pixels density.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A80, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 2 TB. OSCAL Tiger 13 and Samsung Galaxy A80 count with incredibly similar CPUs, both of them have a 8 GB RAM memory and 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy A80 has a very superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a back-facing camera with less mega pixels. OSCAL Tiger 13 features greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 35 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.