Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android |
| -- | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black and White |
| -- | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G is a lot better than OSCAL Tiger 13, with a overall score of 90.5 against 73.4. The Galaxy A90 5G is a a bit heavier but a bit thinner cellphone than OSCAL Tiger 13. Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android operating system, while OSCAL Tiger 13 works with Android 14 operating system.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a much better screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 2 TB and 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with just a little better performance than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. OSCAL Tiger 13 features a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G shoots much better photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a less MP resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.