Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is much better than OSCAL Tiger 13's 73.4 general score. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version, so it provides some nice extra features and better performance. Galaxy C9 Pro is a thinner and just a little bit lighter cellphone than OSCAL Tiger 13.
OSCAL Tiger 13 has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a little sharper display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels count per screen inch and a better 1080 x 1920 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a way less megapixels back facing camera. OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.