Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31 has a score of 86.5, which is much better than OSCAL Tiger 13's overall score of 73.4. The Galaxy M31 design is just a bit lighter but a little bit thicker than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both phones in this review have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M31 has 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a bit more powerful processor than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Samsung Galaxy M31 features a much better looking display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a way better display density.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M31, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB and 192 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy M31 shoots much better photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, because it has a much more megapixels back camera.
The Galaxy M31 counts with greater battery life than OSCAL Tiger 13, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.