Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a score of 87.1, which is better than the OSCAL Tiger 13's global score of 73.4. Samsung Galaxy Note9's body is just a bit thicker and a little bit heavier than OSCAL Tiger 13. Galaxy Note9 features a bit more powerful processor than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy Note9 has an incredibly better looking screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better pixels density and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. Samsung Galaxy Note9 shoots way better photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a back-facing camera with a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note9, because it has 128 GB more internal memory and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 2 TB. The OSCAL Tiger 13 features better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.