Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black and White |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than OSCAL Tiger 13, with a overall score of 77.8 against 73.4. Both of these phones have the same Android 14 OS (Operating System). The vivo X Fold 3 Pro construction is noticeably thinner but just a bit heavier than the OSCAL Tiger 13. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because it has a larger display, a lot greater display pixels density and a much better 2200 x 2480px resolution.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a much faster CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. OSCAL Tiger 13 features more storage capacity to install applications and games than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 2 TB.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little longer battery performance than OSCAL Tiger 13, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 5000mAh. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both have the same resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.