Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 262 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than OSCAL Tiger 13, getting an 85.5 score against 73.4. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's design is a little thicker but a bit lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 13. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a better looking display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better amount of pixels per inch in the display and a way higher 1080 x 2246 resolution.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit faster processor than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a greater camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a camera in the back with a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution. OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same 256 GB internal memory capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 2 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 has better battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.