Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Panasonic | LG |
| Android 4.2.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.50 x 3.40 x 1.20 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 14.40 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qulacomm Snpadragon 600 APQ8064T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1000 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 7.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is much better than the Panasonic Toughpad FZ-X1, getting an 81.3 score against 58.9. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is way thinner and noticeably lighter than the Panasonic Toughpad FZ-X1. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better processing power than Panasonic Toughpad FZ-X1, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a brighter screen than Panasonic Toughpad FZ-X1, because it has a bigger display, a much higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a much higher pixels quantity per display inch. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior camera than Panasonic Toughpad FZ-X1, because it has a way higher resolution camera.
LG V35 ThinQ features much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Panasonic Toughpad FZ-X1, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Panasonic Toughpad FZ-X1 features a superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 6200mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more money than the Panasonic Toughpad FZ-X1, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.