Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 58.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Panasonic | Samsung |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.50 x 3.40 x 1.20 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 14.40 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qulacomm Snpadragon 600 APQ8064T chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 2.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1000 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 7.68 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 80.7, which is a lot better than Panasonic Toughpad FZ-X1's 58.9 overall score. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 3 has the newer 5.0 version while Panasonic Toughpad FZ-X1 has Android 4.2.2 version, so it provides you some nice extra features and enhanced performance. Galaxy Note 3's body is a lot lighter and noticeably thinner than the Panasonic Toughpad FZ-X1.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a little faster processor than Panasonic Toughpad FZ-X1, because it has a much better graphics processing unit working at 600 megahertz, 1 GB more RAM and a greater number of faster cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a better display than Panasonic Toughpad FZ-X1, because it has a lot better resolution of 1920 x 1080, a little larger screen and a better screen density.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Panasonic Toughpad FZ-X1, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds up to 64 GB, the Galaxy Note 3 also has 64 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 shoots much better photos and videos than Panasonic Toughpad FZ-X1, because it has a way better resolution camera.
The Panasonic Toughpad FZ-X1 counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 6200mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also a bit cheaper, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.