Compare phones
Pantech Pocket
P9060ZTE Warp
N860| Global Score | |
| 41.1 | 45.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Pantech | ZTE |
| Android 2.3 | Android 2.3.5 |
| 2011-10-11 | 2011-10-20 |
| 4.52 x 3.07 x 0.44 inches | 5.10 x 2.70 x 0.45 inches |
| 4.66 ounces | 4.93 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 75.00 | $ 75.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 4.3 inches |
| 600 x 800 pixels | 480 x 800 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 250 pixels per inch | 217 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8655 chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | Single-Core 1000 MHz processor |
| -- | 512 MB RAM |
| GPU | Yes GPU |
| 7.2 | 7.38 |
| Storage | |
| 614,4 MB internal memory | 4 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 2.52 | 2.5 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | -- |
| 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 3.9 | 2.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 432 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | 270 hours standby time 7.5 hours talk time |
| 3.52 | 3.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 2.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Warp is better than the Pantech Pocket, getting a overall score of 45.6 against 41.1. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but ZTE Warp has 2.3.5 version while Pantech Pocket has Android 2.3 version, so it offers a couple additional features and better performance. Even being the best device in this review, the ZTE Warp design is a bit thicker and a little heavier than the Pantech Pocket.
Pantech Pocket features a bit more vivid display than ZTE Warp, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch and a slightly higher 800 x 600px resolution. Pantech Pocket features slightly more memory capacity to install games and applications than ZTE Warp, although it has only 614,4 MB internal storage.
ZTE Warp counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Pantech Pocket. They have a Single-Core CPU. The ZTE Warp features a camera that's just as good as Pantech Pocket's camera, both of them have a 5 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera. Pantech Pocket counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than ZTE Warp, because it has 1650mAh of battery capacity against 1600mAh.
ZTE Warp costs the same than Pantech Pocket, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.