Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Pantech | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.68 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Adreno 330 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 703 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is much better than the Pantech Vega Iron 2's global score of 62.6. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Pantech Vega Iron 2 has Android 4.4.2. The LG V50 ThinQ body is just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Pantech Vega Iron 2.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a bit better looking display than Pantech Vega Iron 2, because it has a higher pixel density, a larger display and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Pantech Vega Iron 2, because although it has a SD card slot that holds 48 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little faster processor than Pantech Vega Iron 2, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM memory. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with better battery duration than Pantech Vega Iron 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better camera than Pantech Vega Iron 2, although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a lesser MP resolution back facing camera.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the LG V50 ThinQ is also cheaper than the Pantech Vega Iron 2.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.