Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Pantech | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.68 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Adreno 330 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 703 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is way better than the Pantech Vega Iron 2, having a score of 81.3 against 62.6. The LG V35 ThinQ is a just a little bit thinner but a little bit heavier phone than the Pantech Vega Iron 2. LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better looking display than Pantech Vega Iron 2, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels, more pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit larger display.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Pantech Vega Iron 2, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and more RAM. LG V35 ThinQ has more storage to install applications and games than Pantech Vega Iron 2, because although it has an external SD slot that holds 48 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage.
LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better battery life than Pantech Vega Iron 2, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3220mAh. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better camera than Pantech Vega Iron 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a more MP back camera.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more money than the Pantech Vega Iron 2, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.