Search


Compare phones

Global Score
27.345.6
Basic Information
PhilipsZTE
--Android 2.3.5
--2011-10-20
3.92 x 1.65 x 0.53 inches5.10 x 2.70 x 0.45 inches
2.29 ounces4.93 ounces
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 75.00$ 75.00
Display / Screen
1.5 inches4.3 inches
128 x 128 pixels 480 x 800 pixels
STNTFT
121 pixels per inch217 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
5.47
Performance
--Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8655 chipset
processor Single-Core 1000 MHz processor
--512 MB RAM
GPUYes GPU
5.767.38
Storage
--4 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
02.5
Camera
--5.00 MP
05.5
Networks
--Wi-Fi
GPRS and GSMEV-DO A and CDMA
SIM--
0.22.6
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery1600mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
500 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
270 hours standby time
7.5 hours talk time
2.243.44
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.1
--GPS
--Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

ZTE Warp has a global score of 45.6, which is much better than the Philips 198's 27.3 score. ZTE Warp is a somewhat thinner but much heavier cellphone than the Philips 198. The ZTE Warp counts with an extremely better processing unit than Philips 198, because it has a higher number of cores. ZTE Warp has a lot better screen than Philips 198, because it has a much bigger screen, a much higher 800 x 480 resolution and way more pixels per inch in the display.

ZTE Warp counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Philips 198. The ZTE Warp features a much longer battery lifetime than Philips 198, because it has a 100% greater battery capacity. ZTE Warp features a way better camera than Philips 198.

ZTE Warp costs exactly the same than Philips 198.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.