Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 33.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Philips | |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 4.13 x 1.85 x 0.54 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 2.92 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 125.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 5 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 182 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | No touch screen |
| 6.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 11,26 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.2 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 4.51 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 980mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 655 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.56 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a global score of 81.6, which is way better than Philips 392's global score of 33.3. Google Pixel 2's construction is way thinner but noticeably heavier than the Philips 392. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a much sharper display than Philips 392, because it has a way higher screen density and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 1920px.
The Google Pixel 2 has a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Philips 392, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 2 features a much powerful CPU than Philips 392, because it has a greater number of cores (and also faster).
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a much longer battery performance than Philips 392, because it has 2700mAh of battery capacity. Google Pixel 2 counts with a way better camera than Philips 392, because it has a lot more MP back camera.
Google Pixel 2 costs a bit more money than Philips 392, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.