Search


Compare phones

Global Score
33.335.8
Basic Information
PhilipsPalm
--webOS
--2009-09-09
4.13 x 1.85 x 0.54 inches4.37 x 2.17 x 0.43 inches
2.92 ounces3.51 ounces
$ 125.00$ 100.00
Display / Screen
--2.6 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)320 x 400 pixels
TFTTFT
182 pixels per inch197 pixels per inch
ResistiveCapacitive, Multi-touch
6.16.8
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
11,26 MB internal memory8 GB internal memory
microSD external memory slotNo SD card slot
0.23.3
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
4.514.73
GPRS and GSMEV-DO A and CDMA
SIM--
0.20.2
Battery Life
980mAh Li-Ion Battery1150mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
655 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
350 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
2.562.8
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
--GPS
--Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The Palm Pixi has a score of 35.8, which is a little bit better than Philips 392's overall score of 33.3. The Palm Pixi body is somewhat heavier but a lot thinner than Philips 392. The Philips 392 and the Palm Pixi have similar CPUs, although the Palm Pixi also has a larger number of megahertz cores.

Palm Pixi counts with a much better screen than Philips 392, because it has a higher resolution of 400 x 320 and a bit higher pixel number per inch of screen. Palm Pixi counts with a bit better camera than Philips 392, because it has a lot higher resolution back camera. Palm Pixi features a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Philips 392, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 8 GB internal storage capacity.

The Palm Pixi has a little better battery lifetime than Philips 392, because it has a 17 percent greater battery size.

In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the Palm Pixi is also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a great choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.