Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 50.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Plum | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.21 x 2.91 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6582M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP2 (416 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 780 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is a lot better than Plum Coach Plus II's overall score of 50.8. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while Plum Coach Plus II has Android 4.4.2. LG V50 ThinQ's construction is heavier but thinner than the Plum Coach Plus II.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a sharper display than Plum Coach Plus II, because it has a lot better 1440 x 3120 resolution, a little bit larger screen and a way higher pixels density. The LG V50 ThinQ features a better processing power than Plum Coach Plus II, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The LG V50 ThinQ shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Plum Coach Plus II, because it has a camera in the back with way more mega pixels and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality. LG V50 ThinQ features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Plum Coach Plus II, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 124 GB more internal memory.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a really longer battery performance than Plum Coach Plus II, because it has a 67% more battery size.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Plum Coach Plus II, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.