Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 43.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Plum | LG |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 4.66 x 2.21 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.28 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink, Red and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6572M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 2.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1350mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 780 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is way better than the Plum Sync 3.5's general score of 43.6. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Plum Sync 3.5 has Android 4.2.2. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is somewhat thinner but noticeably heavier than the Plum Sync 3.5.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a lot better screen than Plum Sync 3.5, because it has a lot bigger display, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a way greater display density. LG V50 ThinQ has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Plum Sync 3.5, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior CPU than Plum Sync 3.5, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and 6 more cpu cores. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a really longer battery duration than Plum Sync 3.5, because it has a 196% bigger battery size.
The LG V50 ThinQ captures a lot better photographs and videos than Plum Sync 3.5, because it has a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, LG V50 ThinQ is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.