Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.2 | 50.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Plum | ZTE |
| Android 4.4 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-03-30 |
| 4.74 x 2.50 x 0.39 inches | 5.73 x 2.83 x 0.36 inches |
| 3.42 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 854 x 480 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 245 pixels per inch | 196 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6572M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 304 GPU |
| 8.19 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.42 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 6.82 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.4 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2200mAh Micro SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 760 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.88 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The ZTE Tempo Go is slightly better than the Plum Sync 4.0, with a score of 50.8 against 46.2. The ZTE Tempo Go design is lighter and just a bit thinner than the Plum Sync 4.0. Both devices in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but the ZTE Tempo Go has 8.1 Oreo version and Plum Sync 4.0 has Android 4.4 version.
Plum Sync 4.0 has a much sharper screen than ZTE Tempo Go, because although it has a really smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 854 x 480 pixels, the Plum Sync 4.0 also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Plum Sync 4.0 has a bit better processor than ZTE Tempo Go, because although it has 768 MB lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
Plum Sync 4.0 takes better photos and videos than ZTE Tempo Go. Both of them have the same resolution camera, the same (HD) video quality and the same video frame rates. ZTE Tempo Go has a very superior memory for applications and games than Plum Sync 4.0, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 32 GB, the ZTE Tempo Go also has 8 GB internal memory.
ZTE Tempo Go features a much longer battery life than Plum Sync 4.0, because it has 2200mAh of battery capacity.
ZTE Tempo Go is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.