Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Plum | LG |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 4.52 x 2.38 x 0.48 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 3.77 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6572M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.82 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1350mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 750 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a lot better than Plum Trigger Pro, with a overall score of 81.3 against 48. The LG V35 ThinQ is a noticeably heavier but incredibly thinner phone than the Plum Trigger Pro. LG V35 ThinQ features a quite better hardware performance than Plum Trigger Pro, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and 5,5 GB more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much more vibrant display than Plum Trigger Pro, because it has a much higher pixel amount per inch of screen, a lot bigger screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. LG V35 ThinQ has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Plum Trigger Pro, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 60 GB more internal memory capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a greater camera than Plum Trigger Pro, because it has a much better (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with a lot better 16 megapixels resolution. The LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior battery duration than Plum Trigger Pro, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more than the Plum Trigger Pro, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.