Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-10-22 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.24 x 3.11 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 is slightly better than Razer Phone 2, getting a 77 score against 70.1. LG V20's body is a bit thinner and way lighter than the Razer Phone 2, although it was released 2 years before. Razer Phone 2 has a bit better performance than LG V20, because it has a larger number of cores and 4 GB more RAM memory.
Razer Phone 2 has a little more vivid display than LG V20. Both of them have exactly the same 1440 x 2560 resolution, a same size screen and the same pixels density. LG V20 features a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Razer Phone 2, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG V20 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Razer Phone 2 counts with better battery performance than LG V20, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. LG V20's camera is very similar to Razer Phone 2's camera, because although the LG V20 has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have the same video definition and a same size aperture, it also counts with a much more megapixels camera.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, LG V20 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.