Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-11-15 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.24 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo is a little bit better than Razer Phone, having a general score of 76.4 against 69.6. The Motorola Droid Turbo is a way older and way thicker phone than the Razer Phone, but Motorola made it lighter anyway. The Motorola Droid Turbo has just a bit better performance than Razer Phone, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a sharper screen than Razer Phone, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a just a bit greater pixel quantity per screen inch. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit better camera than Razer Phone, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures in low-light environments and worse 24 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Razer Phone has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal memory. The Razer Phone counts with a little longer battery duration than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 3% bigger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Motorola Droid Turbo is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.