Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-11-15 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.24 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 345.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 5s is a bit better than the Razer Phone, having a global score of 76.4 against 69.6. Xiaomi Mi 5s's construction is notably lighter than the Razer Phone, although it is a little bit thicker and was released a bit more more than a year before. The Razer Phone has a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi 5s counts with a slightly better display than Razer Phone, although it has a quite inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a bit smaller display and a lot worse 1080 x 1920 resolution. Xiaomi Mi 5s takes a bit better photographs and videos than Razer Phone, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have a back facing camera with a 12 mega-pixels resolution, the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi 5s also counts with a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Razer Phone counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Razer Phone has superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The Xiaomi Mi 5s not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.