Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-21 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is much better than the realme GT 5G, getting a general score of 83.7 against 74.8. LG V50 ThinQ's construction has the same thickness than the realme GT 5G, but it's a bit lighter. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while realme GT 5G has Android 11.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better looking display than realme GT 5G, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher screen density and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG V50 ThinQ and realme GT 5G feature extremely similar processing units, and although the LG V50 ThinQ has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
LG V50 ThinQ has much more storage capacity for applications and games than realme GT 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The realme GT 5G features just a bit better battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The realme GT 5G captures a lot better pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the realme GT 5G also counts with a lot more MP camera and a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.