Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-06-21 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gold |
| Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is a little bit better than realme GT 5G's score of 74.8. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy C9 Pro has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version and realme GT 5G has Android 11, so it provides you some extra features. Galaxy C9 Pro is a notably older and just a little heavier cellphone than the realme GT 5G, but Samsung made it somewhat thinner anyway.
Realme GT 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite larger screen, a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little higher display pixels density. Realme GT 5G counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the realme GT 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than realme GT 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 256 GB. The realme GT 5G features a little better battery life than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The realme GT 5G counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution, a way more mega pixels camera and a larger aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.