Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-21 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| -- | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 is much better than the realme GT 5G, with a overall score of 87.1 against 74.8. Despite being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 design is incredibly older, just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than the realme GT 5G. The Galaxy Note9 features just a bit better looking display than realme GT 5G, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Note9 also has a better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than realme GT 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a CPU that's very similar to the processor in realme GT 5G, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note9 has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The realme GT 5G has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 13% more battery capacity. The realme GT 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing pictures in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the realme GT 5G also counts with a much larger back camera sensor and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.