Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2016-09-16 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 969.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 7 Plus is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, getting a general score of 83.8 against 72.6. IPhone 7 Plus's design is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than realme X3 SuperZoom, although it was released many years before. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a little better processing power than iPhone 7 Plus, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster) and a higher amount of RAM memory.
IPhone 7 Plus has a bit better screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel amount per display inch. IPhone 7 Plus features a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a way better camera than Apple iPhone 7 Plus, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, better video frame rate and a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a very superior battery performance than iPhone 7 Plus, because it has a 45% bigger battery size.
Although iPhone 7 Plus is a better device, it costs a lot more than the realme X3 SuperZoom, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the realme X3 SuperZoom. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the realme X3 SuperZoom, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.