Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 is better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, with a overall score of 85 against 72.6. Despite of the fact that the iPhone 8 is extremely older than realme X3 SuperZoom, it's construction is thinner and a lot lighter. IPhone 8 counts with a little faster processing unit than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a lower number of slower cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
IPhone 8 counts with a display that's very similar to realme X3 SuperZoom's screen, although the iPhone 8 has a really smaller display, a way worse resolution of 750 x 1334px and a little bit lower quantity of pixels per inch of screen. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much better camera than iPhone 8, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a much larger camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photos and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
IPhone 8 has a way bigger memory to install games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone 8, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 1821mAh.
The iPhone 8 is a lot more expensive than realme X3 SuperZoom, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.