Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS Max is better than realme X3 SuperZoom, getting a global score of 84.5 against 72.6. The Apple iPhone XS Max design is thinner than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's a bit heavier and was released about a year before. Apple iPhone XS Max features a bit better processor than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser and slower cpu cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Apple iPhone XS Max features just a bit better display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher display pixel density and a slightly higher 1242 x 2688 resolution. The realme X3 SuperZoom takes a lot better photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The realme X3 SuperZoom features improved battery performance than iPhone XS Max, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone XS Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than realme X3 SuperZoom, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the realme X3 SuperZoom. If you want to save some dollars, you can get realme X3 SuperZoom, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.