Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, having an 80.3 score against 72.6. Google Nexus 6P's design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the realme X3 SuperZoom, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Nexus 6P features just a bit better looking screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better pixels density. Realme X3 SuperZoom shoots much better videos and photos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has faster 60 fps video frame rate, a larger camera aperture for better low light photography and videos, a much bigger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality pictures and videos and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Google Nexus 6P's storage capacity to store more apps and games is very similar to realme X3 SuperZoom's one, they have equal internal storage capacity. The realme X3 SuperZoom has superior battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 22% larger battery capacity.
Google Nexus 6P costs a lot more than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.