Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is better than realme X3 SuperZoom, having an 81.6 score against 72.6. Even though Google Pixel 2 is incredibly older than the realme X3 SuperZoom, it's body is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner. The Google Pixel 2 features a bit better looking screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density.
Google Pixel 2 counts with as much storage capacity for games and applications as realme X3 SuperZoom, both of them have the same 128 GB internal memory. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit faster processor than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a lot better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and a F1.8 camera aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a camera with way more megapixels, better video frame rate and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Google Pixel 2 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.