Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, getting an 81.3 score against 72.6. Google Pixel XL is an extremely older phone than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it is lighter and a little thinner anyway. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The Google Pixel XL counts with just a bit better display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Realme X3 SuperZoom takes way better pictures and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has higher video frame rate, a way larger back camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality, a back facing camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low light environments.
The Google Pixel XL's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as realme X3 SuperZoom's one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with improved battery duration than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than realme X3 SuperZoom, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the realme X3 SuperZoom. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel XL, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the realme X3 SuperZoom, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.