Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 is just a bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom, getting a 79.1 score against 72.6. LG V30's construction is thinner and way lighter than realme X3 SuperZoom, although it was released many years before. LG V30 features a little sharper display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a greater pixel density.
The LG V30 features a much better memory for apps and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Realme X3 SuperZoom has just a little better hardware performance than LG V30, and although they both have 8 cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with improved battery performance than LG V30, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a very superior camera than LG V30, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light images and video, and they both have the same video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a camera with lot more MP, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a lot larger sensor.
The LG V30 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.