Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Aurora black |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is much better than realme X3 SuperZoom's score of 72.6. The LG V50 ThinQ is an older phone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but LG managed to make it just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner. Both devices in this comparison review work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding operating system features.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better looking display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit superior CPU than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has 2 GB more RAM.
Realme X3 SuperZoom captures greater pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution camera.
LG V50 ThinQ features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a bit longer battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 4200mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG V50 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.