Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black and Blue |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo is slightly better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, getting a global score of 76.4 against 72.6. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Motorola Droid Turbo has the newer 4.4.4 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, so it provides you some additional features. The Motorola Droid Turbo design is lighter than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's noticeably thicker and was released many years before.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a little bit better performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and more cores. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a much better looking screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited environments, a camera with a lot higher resolution and higher video frame rate.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little longer battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an 8% greater battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Motorola Droid Turbo is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.