Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black and Blue |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is slightly better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, having a general score of 77.9 against 72.6. These phones include Android operating system, but Motorola DROID Turbo has a more recent 4.4.4 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10. The Motorola DROID Turbo is a noticeably older and a lot thicker cellphone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but Motorola was able to make it lighter anyway.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a little faster CPU than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a brighter screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater display pixel density.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a way better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has better video frame rates, a back-facing camera with way more MP and a bigger aperture for better low-light images.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit superior battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has an 8 percent larger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Motorola DROID Turbo is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.