Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, with a overall score of 81.2 against 72.6. Motorola Edge 50 is a much newer cellphone, and it's also lighter and thinner than the realme X3 SuperZoom. These phones work with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 has newer 14 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 50. They have a 8 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 50 has a better looking display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a quite better resolution of 1220 x 2712px, a quite bigger screen and a just a bit higher pixels density.
Realme X3 SuperZoom takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a back facing camera with a much better 64 MP resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 has a much greater memory for applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 has longer battery performance than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.